Worksheet for chapter 8, How to measure an app growth experiment
Worksheet 8 — Measurement card
Use with chapter 8, Measuring an intervention. Fill sections 1–5 before the change ships. Fill section 6 when the window closes.
App: ______________ Change: ______________________ Ships on: __________
1. Baseline
Metric (exact definition and source): ______________________ Last 8–12 comparable periods: ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ → normal range ______ to ______
2. Exposure
Who experiences the change: ______________________ Can I measure the exposed group separately? ☐ yes, how: ______________ ☐ no (the total will dilute the effect)
3. Window
From __________ to __________. I will not judge before __________.
4. Confounders in the window
- ☐ holiday/season ☐ release ☐ price change ☐ featuring ☐ ads ☐ community/press post ☐ competitor launch ☐ store outage ☐ metric definition change ☐ other: ______ Comparison group (if no split test): ______________ — remember: the other platform is a hint, not a control group.
5. Verdict rules (write now, don't edit later)
| Verdict | Rule |
|---|---|
| Worked | |
| Did not work | |
| Harmful | |
| Inconclusive |
Small-sample check
Counts: assumes independent events, a stable underlying rate and N above ~20. A sanity check, not a significance test.
- One period vs its long-run average N: ±2√N. N = ______ → ±______
- Two periods vs each other: ±2.8√N. N = ______ → ±______
- Better still: the 8–12-period normal range in section 1.
Rates: use the test brief's planning estimate or the store's own test result (its confidence level and minimum detectable effect, under its own assumptions).
6. Result (when the window closes)
- Observed: ______________________
- The metric changed? ☐ yes ☐ no ☐ within normal range
- The goal was reached? ☐ yes ☐ partly ☐ no
- Our action caused it? ☐ strong evidence (split test) ☐ weak (before/after with confounders) ☐ not established
- Verdict: ☐ worked ☐ did not work ☐ harmful ☐ inconclusive
- Copied to the decision journal on __________ ☐